You don't happen to have a team who is losing do you?!

Two teams in Group 3 have similar write ups but there is currently a clear leader so this theory doesn't really add up.

Mmmmmmm I think the theory does add up. Yes group three had a clear leader, but that clear leader has not done a massive write up.

9 teams and we vote for three.
In each group the team with the least amount written is winning.
Clearly people are voting for the ones that did not do a big write up.

I will add I voted for the ones with the least written

Mmmmmmm I think the theory does add up. Yes group three had a clear leader, but that clear leader has not done a massive write up.

9 teams and we vote for three.
In each group the team with the least amount written is winning.
Clearly people are voting for the ones that did not do a big write up.

I will add I voted for the ones with the least written

I didn't, I voted fairly. If anyone is doing that it seems it cause their team didn't get picked so they are just devaluing the game on defiance which shows a lack of respect to me.

If 1 or 2 have done that it's a shame and not something I agree with as previously stated but the majority will vote fairly and the results will be a fair reflection. Perhaps the teams with the biggest write ups felt they needed to write loads to defend their selections as they were not that great... Which backs up the voting.

Well they didn't, and the vote will decide who wins go get over it.

It's a fun competition for a few points. Way too much moaning on here.

No one is moaning, this is a general chat about the competition that's all. This is a forum after all.