Login    Forum    FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 1706
Ok so a few of us in the WhatsApp group have been chatting about this.

There are still a couple of very busy leagues but outside of that there are alot of top legend's being left to almost rot away.

A good few have agreed that being able to buy two players at EOS or even a second window to be opened up in say week 13 or something.

Ben has agreed to look at this but obviously doesn't want to waste his time. So setting this up so people can show their interest in this idea.

Cheers

_________________
Current teams:


Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:27 pm
Posts: 1065
Definitely a good idea if it can be implemented.
Totally in favour

_________________
Wigan 95
CL Winner
Man City 109 FA Cup S5
Dresden 114
Blackburn & Espanyol 115
Bochum (League Cup) & Bradford 117
WIGAN ATH 118
WBA , Bochum 120
Hearts, Feyenoord, Man U 119
Burnley 121
Aberdeen 122


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:47 pm
Posts: 46
I also think this is a good idea . Would keep alot of people interested in this game .


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 2689
Location: Worcester
I think it’s a good idea but I feel the mid-season one should have a caveat, not sure what ?

Same league ?
21yo or under ?
Certain max value ??
Only a certain % over max - maybe correlated to DC ??

Would just get people thinking a bit more ? But maybe hard to implement for Ben ?

For me, I just like the idea of something different and not leading a horse to water

_________________
Marseille100(S2-9)
Montpellier107(S1-4)
Mallorca109(S1)
M’pellier112(S1-5)
Inverness113(S1)
Napoli114(S1)
M’pellier115(S1-2)
M’pellier116(S1-2)
MGB117(S1-6)
PSV118(S1-3)
Leicester119(S1-79)
Cheltenham/Tenerife120(S1-7)
Real Sociedad 121
Palace122


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:10 pm
Posts: 142
Location: Ashford, Kent
Sounds like a great idea to me.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:34 pm
Posts: 34
Yep!! I’m 100% on this, annoys the hell out of me that there are legends just wasting away at unmanaged teams and would also give an actual reason to get hold of cash mid season, another thing it may get other managers involved as loads of these unmanaged teams have cash so it wouldn’t be long until they would be able to buy a legend player they’ve always wanted or use that player in a swap to bring that team back to life again!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 1706
Natty O wrote:
I think it’s a good idea but I feel the mid-season one should have a caveat, not sure what ?

Same league ?
21yo or under ?
Certain max value ??
Only a certain % over max - maybe correlated to DC ??

Would just get people thinking a bit more ? But maybe hard to implement for Ben ?

For me, I just like the idea of something different and not leading a horse to water


Could look at something like this if it makes ben a little easier about setting it up.

I would be against the DC tho as that would exclude new managers getting involved with the bidding.

_________________
Current teams:


Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:05 pm
Posts: 1084
Location: knighton,powys
I think this is a great idea, i think it should be standard for any game that goes past season 5/6 as it would keep the interest in the game, personally would prefer if new players can not have dc but have a minimum amount of weeks game time as nothing frustrates me more then certain teams getting taken over the week of the eos buys and then mysteriously being unmanaged 4/5 weeks later!

But a definite plus for the game and if it implements as standard across all games after a certain amount of seasons its worth the time and effort to implement it :)

_________________
Ath Madrid 122


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 1:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2713
Yep keen for this idea, good suggestion. :) :)

_________________
Active Teams

Game 122 - AC Milan
Game 122 - Honved
Game 123 - Bayern Munich
Game 124 - Al Nassr


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 962
Location: UE Towers
Have moved this to the general forum as it is something that could potentially effect all games. Happy to hear more thoughts about it.

_________________
The voice of Ultimate Europe...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:38 pm
Posts: 640
I would be happy for this to be rolled out across all games.

I wouldn't be against this being introduced as early as season 1 - I'm all for some added excitement mid-season when things typically start to settle down.

I don't think there should be a maximum cap on the amount a manager can bid.

_________________
Atletico Madrid/Juventus 86
Ajax 99
St Mirren 107
Arsenal 112
Genoa 121


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:36 pm
Posts: 419
themouth1888 wrote:
Ok so a few of us in the WhatsApp group have been chatting about this.

There are still a couple of very busy leagues but outside of that there are alot of top legend's being left to almost rot away.

A good few have agreed that being able to buy two players at EOS or even a second window to be opened up in say week 13 or something.

Ben has agreed to look at this but obviously doesn't want to waste his time. So setting this up so people can show their interest in this idea.

Cheers



Well thought of mate :P

This is a great idea as a game becomes less active in future seasons.

It's a yes from me :D

_________________
Borussia Dortmund - G122


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:28 pm
Posts: 2076
Location: Dundee - City of Discovery
i think this a great idea, however instead of buying the player for cash when the new manager comes along. I think we should be able to do a swap deal regarding the said player so for instance if the player was £60mil instead of getting 80/90mil you can do a swap but the best swap deal for that team should get the player. Meaning that the team in question still is getting a player or players and could potentially strengthen there team for someone else to take them over.

_________________
Dundee United - Game 122
Champions League Winner season 3


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:21 pm
Posts: 193
I like the idea but don't think it should be implemented until later seasons in the game when the leagues in question have totally died off. Maybe could buy 2 players from unmanaged teams with less than 3 managers or so in that league? Don't want to be stripping sides that another manager could potentially want to take over in a busy league & be making teams weaker. Game 120 still really busy in season 4 & managers still taking over sides in England. Maybe look at season 5-6 onwards

_________________
Bayern Munich 116

Arsenal 117


Last edited by Wezza on Sat May 02, 2020 4:04 pm, edited 4 times in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 1706
Just so everyone aware game 119 approaching season 7 in a few turns so something for later on in games

_________________
Current teams:


Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:33 pm
Posts: 1943
Sorry but this is a big no from myself.

Being able to buy to players Eos would destroy other leagues, even if there is just one manager in it then that's not acceptable for me.

This also has huge ramifications for active leagues as consider the amount of players being brought into the league.

I really don't like this idea and I urge people to approach with caution, think of the consequences long term.

_________________
Charlton 122


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 7:13 pm
Posts: 1128
Big no from me


I don’t see the point In it......if managers are in a empty league then move league if that’s such a issue


Totally against it......played in game since game 92 and never heard of this being an issue

_________________
Bolton - game 92
Aberdeen - game 98
Bolton/Aberdeen - game 99
Stirling - game 107
Aberdeen - game 110
Dresden - game 112
Udinese - game 121
Vorskla Poltava - game 121
AZ alkmaar - Game 123
Nublense FC - Game 124


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:04 pm
Posts: 834
Location: London, UK
EOS yes, mid season no.

And even EOS is 1 player per team and that particular team can only lose 1 player.

_________________
Fadi Mazloum
Lille 122
https://ultimateeuropepodcast.com/
07787560603
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-------------------
Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2
Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3
Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Man City 121 and 6 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: