| Author |
Message |
|
Martin B
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 2:27 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:08 pm
Posts: 1614
Location: South London
|
|
With recent UE games 121 to 124 in particular seeing teams flooded with POT players it does beg the question that in light of game 124 season 2 EOS rises does there need to be a change made not to the effects of POT but maybe the price of it and/or who is able to have it added.
So here’s a few suggestions interested to hear some feedback on.
1. Perhaps raise the price of POT after season 1 as resources in the game generally become easier to acquire eg
Season 1 - 7 UE pts
Season 2 - 8 UE pts
Season 3 - 9 UE pts etc
Make it a bit more expensive so it doesn’t just get added to everyone just because we can.
2. Limit the age you can add POT to a player to 27. If a player has potential added then don’t they also have the peak and end of career to come? As it stands there is no age limit and it can be added to a 38 year old who hasn’t decided to retire. So a fair line the way I see it would be to cap adding POT to a player at age 27.
3. With point 2 in mind once a player reaches age 28 they are then old enough to become a mentor and that would then feel like a good time for any potential to have been fulfilled in the player and then removed from the player as they reach the peak years of there career.
Appreciate we all love our POT players but has it reached a point where it perhaps needs dialling back a bit? Interested to hear thoughts on it, cheers.
_________________
G123 - Toulouse
G124 - Al-Ahli
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Natty O
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 3:41 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: Worcester
|
|
All makes good sense to me.
_________________
Marseille100(S2-9
M'pellier107(S1-4
Mallorca109(S1
M’pellier112(S1-5
ICT113(S1
Napoli114(S1
M’pellier115(S1-2
M’pellier116(S1-2
MGB117(S1-6
PSV118(S1-3
Leicester119(S1-79)
Cheltenham/Tenerife120(S1-7)
R Sociedad121(S1-7)
Palace122
Girona123
Nacional124
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DarthFritzl
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 4:30 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 2832
Location: The basement
|
|
Yeah, can't disagree with any of this Martin. Good points
_________________
Wolfsburg 108, Las Palmas 112, Arsenal 114 and Torino/Molde 119
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:31 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2716
|
|
Personally i think it would spoil the game for managers like Fyffe, Ben, Jamie and a few others who like to have a lot on POT on their players. I don't prioritize POT nor am i a POT collector, so if these changes are implemented it wouldn't effect me much, so looking at it from an impartial side. I just don't think it would be fair to punish the managers who like to prioritize POT, personally. Some managers work hard to chase them deals, to earn the cash, to convert to points, to add POT to their players then they should reap the benefits like a fully Potted squad. Other's like to train and develop players, will they be punished with changes by a cap on karma players next?
Plus i think personally there are a few other area's that could do with a tweak that hits all managers evenly which betters the game overall for everyone, not punish a small minority who just do things in a different way.
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al-Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
