UltimateEuropeForums.net

Was thinking, with the addition of loyalty points and being able to purchase points, I believe there are now to many pot players in the game and also to many SA players. I believe the following would improve the game.

-Scrap loyalty points. No need for them.
-Raise point price to 15m
-Scrap dual SA, I believe one SA was better.

Thoughts?

_________________
Sampdoria 123
New York RB 124

Loyalty points were brought, but I believe they are not needed. Maybe even reduce to 2 at Eos and nothing more.

Raise the price to 15m this would reduce the amount bought, but still make it accessible.

When players could have one SA, it was much better, you really had to think about what SA to add to a player.

_________________
Sampdoria 123
New York RB 124

Let’s hope this thread gets some decent input.

My opinions are simple, keep the duel SA for sure. That’s a no brainer for me, top players are hard to come by when side’s and games are settled so this is a alternative way to make your own top player to keep or even swap on.

Also going to say keep loyalty points, we campaigned for this for so long and this does give a small incentive for manages to stay in games. Also it’s a small comfort to managers like me who spend all the clubs bank balance on improving the side weekly, so having points is a welcomed bonus and deservedly so for loyal managers.

Disagree with it being over crowded with POT tho, especially in 119. Too many SA’s yeah, but wouldn’t say too many POT. But then again how else are the small sides going to make offers for the Maradona’s of the game without adding POT players to entice the selling manager to part?

Keep them the same, especially in EFG & legends games for now. I can honestly say after 14 years in UE and played in about 15/16 different games 119 has to be in the top 3 best for me. So Ben must be doing something right

_________________
Active Teams

Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr

Quite simply....

Agree with Maxi

Points and SA etc is all relative.

_________________
Marseille100(S2-9
M'pellier107(S1-4
Mallorca109(S1
M’pellier112(S1-5
ICT113(S1
Napoli114(S1
M’pellier115(S1-2
M’pellier116(S1-2
MGB117(S1-6
PSV118(S1-3
Leicester119(S1-79)
Cheltenham/Tenerife120(S1-7)
R Sociedad121(S1-7)
Palace122
Girona123
Nacional124

Agreed with Maxi also.

You cannot compare to the legends game, the quality of player is much higher so we will be flooded with the sa's, which in turn gives the smaller sides the points to compete. That's just the nature of that particular game and it cannot be altered.

Loyalty points are exactly that, in place for the loyal players. I will still be here in 119 when loads leave for 120, which in turn won't really allow me to deal too much, so the points to improve your players are essential to keep players like myself interested in the game and keep paying into Ben's UE pocket

_________________
Strasbourg & Breidablik Game 122
Atalanta Game 123
Penarol Game 124

On the point of loyalty points they are meant to be just that, for players that stay loyal to a particular team. At the minute they are not being used like that. Teams are accruing points when they do not have a manager which I believe is wrong.

Points for loyalty, not just random points for every team.

_________________
Sampdoria 123
New York RB 124

Im with Maxi, i wouldnt change it at all.

I think all the new additions are very welcomed and needed at this day and age of the game.

_________________
Fadi Mazloum
Botafogo G124
NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON
07787560603
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-------------------
Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2
Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3
Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2